Skip to content

Conversation

fmease
Copy link
Member

@fmease fmease commented Jan 23, 2025

Fixes #130978.
Fixes #136188.

TODO: Fix blocking FIXME(fmease)s.
TODO: Clean up tests.

Feel free to review already though!

r? lcnr

@fmease fmease added S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. F-type_alias_impl_trait `#[feature(type_alias_impl_trait)]` rla-silenced Silences rust-log-analyzer postings to the PR it's added on. labels Jan 23, 2025
@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. WG-trait-system-refactor The Rustc Trait System Refactor Initiative (-Znext-solver) labels Jan 23, 2025
Comment on lines 524 to 527
// FIXME(fmease): This is a temporary HACK; rework it. In the next solver,
// we normalize structurally meaning opaque types "remain behind" weak
// aliases. I kind of want to expand_weak_alias_tys this but that's
// pretty hacky, too.
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The HACK mentioned in the PR description.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah 🤔 I don't really know what to do here. I feel like ideally we potentially don't need to recompute things here and report an error using only the original uncovered type as this folder is somewhat :/

I am personally fine with slightly regressing diagnostics here if necessary for that, but don't have a clear idea of how bad this would be

@fmease fmease removed the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Jan 23, 2025
}
} else {
// Regarding *opaque types* specifically, we choose to treat them as non-local,
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We probably want to bring back some of these nicely written points.

@bors

This comment was marked as resolved.

@fmease fmease force-pushed the orphanck-rej-uncovered-opaques branch 4 times, most recently from 414a046 to 21c0272 Compare April 4, 2025 16:25
@fmease fmease force-pushed the orphanck-rej-uncovered-opaques branch from 21c0272 to aba5f47 Compare April 5, 2025 05:18
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Apr 9, 2025

☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #139555) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
F-type_alias_impl_trait `#[feature(type_alias_impl_trait)]` rla-silenced Silences rust-log-analyzer postings to the PR it's added on. S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. WG-trait-system-refactor The Rustc Trait System Refactor Initiative (-Znext-solver)
Projects
None yet
4 participants